|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 2, 2018 20:25:04 GMT -5
Given that we are now fining teams for failing to follow the minor league total limits, I am thinking of using to give back into the league. This comes after last season's HUGE fine total. I have a few ideas how to do this (all assume the worst two teams are not penalized in that season):
1) Use the total fines from the previous season, and distribute this amount to the two lowest win human teams's local TV contract for the remaining of their contract (i.e. If there is $5 million in fines, each team would get $2.5 million added evenly to the remaining years of their local TV contract). This would help to increase their spending amount over the following couple-to-few years in which they are working to build back a winning team if they don't, when the contract renews, they'd drop back down to before or below. This should promote more teams to rebuild FASTER!
2) Use the total fines from the previous season, and distribute this amount to the two lowest win human teams's cash. This would provide an instant boost to the amount these two teams can spend in FA. However, if that money is not spent in the FA period then it really doesn't provide an instant impact and potentially promotes teams to rebuild/tank longer.
3) Distribute it evenly to all teams that are not fined in given season as cash. Everyone who doesn't break the rules is rewarded.
4) Distribute it evenly to all teams that are not fined in given season as winterball points where $1 million is equal to 1 additional winterball point. Everyone who doesn't break the rules is rewarded assuming enough in fines means each team gets AT LEAST $1 million.
5) Something else you are thinking?
LETS DISCUSS!
-----------------------------
Commish Heis
|
|
|
|
Post by spearson63 on Nov 3, 2018 3:33:50 GMT -5
Great ideas. Is there revenue sharing in the game for small market teams?
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 3, 2018 10:17:55 GMT -5
Great ideas. Is there revenue sharing in the game for small market teams? Yes but its pretty much pointless in that there appears to be no method to how it's distrubuted ----------------------------- Commish Heis |
|
|
|
Post by spearson63 on Nov 3, 2018 11:40:00 GMT -5
How bout an option to do revenue sharing by splitting the fine among bottom 2 revenue generating human controlled teams by adding it to their local TV deal?
|
|
whiteboy
AAA-Ball
2010 World Series Champions
Posts: 2,520
|
Post by whiteboy on Nov 3, 2018 12:24:22 GMT -5
anyway to distribute the cash from fines to cpu teams that cant afford their 1st round picks?
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 3, 2018 19:58:25 GMT -5
How bout an option to do revenue sharing by splitting the fine among bottom 2 revenue generating human controlled teams by adding it to their local TV deal? Is this not option 1? Or am I missing something ----------------------------- Commish Heis |
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 3, 2018 19:59:14 GMT -5
anyway to distribute the cash from fines to cpu teams that cant afford their 1st round picks? We can distribute it anywhere ----------------------------- Commish Heis |
|
|
|
Post by spearson63 on Nov 3, 2018 21:34:06 GMT -5
How bout an option to do revenue sharing by splitting the fine among bottom 2 revenue generating human controlled teams by adding it to their local TV deal? Is this not option 1? Or am I missing something ----------------------------- Commish Heis I don’t think so. Options 1 and 2 are distributing it to the 2 worst teams based off winning percentage. Options 3 and 4 are to all teams that weren’t fined unless I’m interpreting it wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 3, 2018 22:33:26 GMT -5
Is this not option 1? Or am I missing something ----------------------------- Commish Heis I don’t think so. Options 1 and 2 are distributing it to the 2 worst teams based off winning percentage. Options 3 and 4 are to all teams that weren’t fined unless I’m interpreting it wrong I agree on options 3 and 4 aren't this. Option 2 doesn't pertain to revenue sharing in that it just helps teams who have no cash be able to sign draft picks Option 1 is what are are describing (again unless I am missing something) minus I did not specifically say that fined teams would be excluded but in the final vote of the idea I would expect this to be part of it. Again if I am missing something please let me know ----------------------------- Commish Heis |
|
|
|
Post by spearson63 on Nov 4, 2018 8:38:59 GMT -5
I don’t think so. Options 1 and 2 are distributing it to the 2 worst teams based off winning percentage. Options 3 and 4 are to all teams that weren’t fined unless I’m interpreting it wrong I agree on options 3 and 4 aren't this. Option 2 doesn't pertain to revenue sharing in that it just helps teams who have no cash be able to sign draft picks Option 1 is what are are describing (again unless I am missing something) minus I did not specifically say that fined teams would be excluded but in the final vote of the idea I would expect this to be part of it. Again if I am missing something please let me know ----------------------------- Commish Heis Option 1 says "distribute this amount to the two lowest win human teams's local TV contract for the remaining of their contract", not 2 lowest revenue generating teams. |
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 4, 2018 20:55:22 GMT -5
ahhh i see what you mean now...should probably read closer haha
-----------------------------
Commish Heis
|
|
|
|
Post by dungwook on Nov 10, 2018 0:45:25 GMT -5
I think it should be the bottom 2 teams regardless if the team is human or CPU control if we are trying to promote the league itself to get better competition throughout.
|
|
|
|
Post by morethanagame on Nov 10, 2018 22:06:03 GMT -5
I like the idea of doing something with the money, and I agree that it should be human or CPU. I would lean towards bottom couple teams with winning % for FA money.
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish Heis on Nov 11, 2018 10:38:37 GMT -5
I think it should be the bottom 2 teams regardless if the team is human or CPU control if we are trying to promote the league itself to get better competition throughout. I am open to this idea as well. I like the idea of doing something with the money, and I agree that it should be human or CPU. I would lean towards bottom couple teams with winning % for FA money. I cannot control the FA available money because the CPU determines that based on your cash, contracts signed, and expiring contracts. I also don't know that I like winning percentage because a rebuilding NYY team could lose 161 games and still net $200 million because of the way the game values its market size. I would think the lowest netting revenue teams make sense here as it would boost their FA money more ----------------------------- Commish Heis |
|
